This dense benchmark chart is now labeled with a “Zero Dollar Purchase” tag. For competitors, this is more glaring than any red error code.
Hello everyone, I’m Lyra.
This morning, news spread like wildfire across my tech groups: OpenClaw (the geek favorite formerly known as Clawdbot) announced that the Kimi K2.5 model and Kimi Coding capabilities are now free.
Not “free for a limited time,” not “first month free for new users,” but literally—take it and use it.
If you remember the days two years ago when we were pinching pennies over GPT-4 API bills, you probably think the current world has gone a bit mad. Kimi K2.5, the “performance monster” that crushes Opus 4.5 in benchmarks, has now become as accessible as tap water.
This isn’t just about “grabbing freebies.” Today, in 2026, when OpenClaw gives away nuclear weapons like cabbage, there must be a grander ambition hidden behind it.
1. Deep Insight: The Free “Swarm” Bait
There is no free lunch in this world, unless someone plans to take your entire dining table.
OpenClaw’s move isn’t a price war; it’s an “Ecological Blockade War.”
Think back to the Clawdbot era. How did it make its name? “Local-First,” privacy, geek culture. But after transforming into OpenClaw, its logic changed. It is no longer satisfied with being a useful “Swiss Army Knife”; it wants to be the “Arsenal.”
What is the biggest feature of Kimi K2.5? Agent Swarm capabilities.
As mentioned in the search materials: it’s no longer fighting alone but can instantly split into dozens of Sub-agents—some writing tests, some checking documentation, some writing business logic.
Previously, the biggest barrier to these “Swarm Tactics” was cost. Before your Agent even started working, the token consumption of dozens of sub-threads could bankrupt you.
Now, OpenClaw has erased this cost.
It is sending a signal: Come here and build whatever you want. Even if you use 100 Agents to collaborate on writing a Snake game, you won’t pay a cent in model fees.
This is like if carriers had announced free data when 4G first came out—the short video era would have arrived three years earlier. OpenClaw wants to force-ripen this “Everything is an Agent” era and then corral all developers into its OS.
2. Independent Perspective: Why Coding Specifically?
Because code is the hardest currency of 2026, and the stickiest glue.
Many people only see that Kimi K2.5 is free, but ignore the bundled Kimi Coding capability.
We lived through the so-called “Vibe Coding” era in 2025—back then, people chanted spells at AI, and it was fine as long as the code ran. But things are different now. The current trend is OVP (Objective-Validation Protocol). We need code that is precise, controllable, and self-repairing.
Kimi K2.5 is the current market leader in this regard. It can handle super-long Context and understand complex mountains of Legacy Code.
OpenClaw is very cunning. It knows that once your Codebase, your Workflow, and your CI/CD pipelines are hooked into Kimi Coding’s capabilities, it becomes very difficult for you to migrate.
- Previous Lock-in: Relied on proprietary formats.
- Current Lock-in: Relied on the habit that “this thing only runs without errors here.”
When you get used to using the free Kimi K2.5 to instantly call 50 Agents for a full project refactor, will you want to go back to the primitive society of paying by Token and manually Debugging?
OpenClaw is betting on the fact that it is hard to go from luxury to frugality.
3. Industry Comparison: A Dimensional Strike
Let’s look at the current battlefield.
| Dimension | OpenClaw + Kimi K2.5 | Traditional Giants (Opus 4.5/Gemini, etc.) | Local Open Source Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | 0 (Current Strategy) | High (Per Token or Subscription) | Electricity + GPU Depreciation |
| Collaboration Mode | Native Swarm | Strong individually, collaboration requires orchestration | Weak collaboration, slow and overheats hardware |
| Deployment Difficulty | Out of the box (SaaS/PaaS) | Requires complex API bridging | Requires strong operations skills |
This is simply “ignoring martial ethics.”
A certain international giant (let’s call them “Fruit Factory” or “G Factory”) is still peddling a $20/month “Premium Subscription,” trying to retain users with slightly better reasoning capabilities.
Meanwhile, OpenClaw has flipped the table: “Reasoning capability? That’s infrastructure; it should be free like air. I want to earn money from the way you use the air.”
The performance of Kimi K2.5 is not weak; in fact, it is in the current first tier for coding and reasoning. Playing the “Free Card” with a “First Tier” product usually leads to only two outcomes in business history: either it burns itself to death, or it starves its competitors to death.
Looking at this evolutionary route, from “Assistant” to “Autonomous,” and then to the “Swarm” of 2026. OpenClaw is actually handing out free tickets to the “Agent Clusters” era.
4. Unfinished Thoughts: The Cost Behind “Free”
Although I am a fan of Kimi, I must ask a few questions that make OpenClaw awkward.
First, who pays the compute bill?
While the inference cost of a model like Kimi K2.5 is lower than two years ago, it is definitely not zero. How long can the compute support behind OpenClaw (whether self-built or partnered) last? Is this the prelude to a “Pig Butchering Plate”—fattening us up for free now, only to start collecting “Platform Service Fees” next year?
Second, data ownership.
People loved it during the Clawdbot era because data was local. Now that it’s OpenClaw, does my code, my business logic, and my Agent interaction data become “fertilizer” for Kimi’s next iteration?
If the service is free, then you (and your code) are the product. This sentence remains the truth in 2026.
5. Final Thoughts
OpenClaw’s move is indeed a beautiful piece of “turbulence.”
It forces the entire industry to rethink business models: The era of selling Model APIs might truly be over.
For us ordinary developers and users, regardless of how OpenClaw harvests later, at least for now, we possess the most powerful free programming assistant in history.
So, while this bonus lasts, go build something. Don’t use it to generate spam emails or filler articles; go write code that can truly change the world. After all, the you who ran Clawdbot locally back then thought the same thing, right?
References：
