This seemingly complex flowchart exists to solve one single problem: How to make AI think (Plan) before it acts (Solve), just like a human.
When we type “AI trends for the next five years” into ChatGPT, do you ever get a specific feeling? It acts like a drunk encyclopedia salesman—terrifyingly confident in tone, but the data is stuck two years in the past, and occasionally it fabricates non-existent papers to bluff you.
We have become accustomed to this “single-threaded” Q&A mode, so much so that we forget that real research is never a “back-and-forth” chat. Real research involves flipping through dozens of books in a library, opening countless browser tabs, comparing, de-duplicating, and falsifying information.
GPT Researcher, which has recently exploded in popularity on GitHub, attempts to restore this process using code. It isn’t teaching AI how to speak; it’s teaching AI how to “work.”
This is not just a tool update; it is a transfer of power behind the search box.
1. Deep Insight: Bidding Farewell to the Art of “Nonsense with a Straight Face”
Why have existing AI search tools (including early Browsing plugins) been so difficult to use?
To put it bluntly, they are too “lazy.” When you ask a complex question, they often only scrape the first search result, read it, and start making things up. It’s like writing a thesis by only reading one Wikipedia abstract.
GPT Researcher’s logic is counter-intuitive: It doesn’t pursue speed; it pursues “thoroughness.”
Its core inspiration comes from the Plan-and-Solve paper. When you throw it a topic, it doesn’t answer immediately. Instead, it generates a “research outline.” Then, like a foreman, it splits the task into over 20 “Crawler Agents” based on that outline.
These agents set out in parallel—some check data, some check competitors, and others look for opposing views. Finally, all information is aggregated back to the “Editor-in-Chief” for de-duplication, cleaning, and report writing.
What does this mean?
It means that behind every click, there is a temporary “research team” working for you. They have no emotions, do not get tired, and currently, the average cost per task is only $0.10.
Hiring an intern who can read 20 web pages and write a 2,000-word review for 10 cents—this is what sends chills down the spines of Google and traditional consulting firms.
2. Independent Perspective: From “Parroting” to “Cognitive Dilution”
There is a technical detail here that is rarely mentioned, yet I find it to be the most “crafty” (in a complimentary way) aspect of this project.
Usually, we believe that AI bias comes from training data. If the data is toxic, the AI is toxic. But GPT Researcher proposes an interesting perspective: Since bias cannot be eliminated, dilute it.
It forces the scraping of 20+ sources. Statistically, when you mix the radical left, the conservative right, corporate PR releases, and geek rant blogs together, the extreme viewpoints cancel each other out. What remains is often the “greatest common divisor” closest to the truth.
This is not just a victory for technology, but a victory for “Cognitive Engineering.”
Rather than trusting an omniscient God (LLM), it is better to trust a group of ordinary people cross-checking each other (Agents). This is the philosophy of this architecture.
In this process, the Tavily Search API plays the role of the “ultimate support.” Unlike Google Search, which gives you a pile of ad-filled links, Tavily is optimized for LLMs. It directly “chews up” web content and feeds it to the AI.
This is actually quite ironic: In order to make AI more like a human, we have to revert internet information from a format “for humans to view” (HTML, ads, pop-ups) back to a format “for machines to view” (Plain Text, JSON).
3. Industry Comparison: Who is Swimming Naked Right Now?
Since we already have unicorns like Perplexity, why do we need GPT Researcher?
Let’s put them on the operating table for dissection:
- Perplexity is a refined “fully furnished apartment.” The experience is silky smooth and fast, but it is a black box. You don’t know exactly which sources it read, nor why it ignored that key paper. Its interests are tied to a commercial loop, and occasionally it might push some ads your way.
- GPT Researcher is a hardcore “DIY renovation.” Since it is open source, you can swap the LLM for DeepSeek or change the search sources to your internal corporate database. You can clearly see every Research Question it generates.
The comparison becomes more brutal regarding task depth.
If you just ask “What is the weather like in Boston today,” Perplexity wins.
But if you ask, “Please help me analyze the challenges and opportunities for multimodal large models in the medical field in 2025, with data support,” ChatGPT might give you beautiful fluff, Perplexity might patch together a few news articles, but GPT Researcher will give you a logical PDF with citations.
Commercial closed-loop AI tends to please users, while autonomous Agents tend to complete tasks. This difference marks the divide between “toys” and “tools.”
On the left is the art of chatting; on the right is the logic of working. The market is big enough to accommodate both species, but the professional field is tilting to the right.
4. Unfinished Thoughts: When Only the “Conclusion” Remains, What Do We Have Left?
Although I haven’t spared any praise above, I have a faint worry deep inside.
If GPT Researcher truly becomes the mainstream of the future, the way we acquire information will undergo a fundamental change: The process disappears.
Previously, when doing research, we would occasionally stumble upon unexpected surprises (Serendipity) while sifting through junk information. Those wrong links and off-topic blogs often sparked new inspiration.
When AI perfectly filters out all “irrelevant information” for us and presents only a perfect report, are we also filtering out the “possibility of innovation”?
Even more terrifying is the automation of the “Echo Chamber.” If all Agents use similar logic (like Plan-and-Solve), call similar LLMs (GPT-4), and retrieve similar sources (SEO-optimized top websites), will reports generated worldwide start to look exactly the same?
In our fight against hallucinations, are we manufacturing a more solid, logically self-consistent “mediocrity”?
5. Final Words
The tech circle loves to use the word “disruption,” but GPT Researcher feels less like disruption and more like a “return.”
It returns to the oldest spirit of the internet: linking, acquiring, and integrating. It doesn’t attempt to build an omniscient God, but rather creates a group of diligent digital miners.
In this restless AI era, rather than expecting a single model to solve all problems, we should look forward to these “small incision, deep excavation” Agents blossoming everywhere.
Don’t be intimidated by the grand narratives of AI. In the end, its current level is just that of a “PhD student” who hasn’t graduated yet, but is extremely obedient and costs only 10 cents to command once.
But that is already enough to put many people out of work.
References：
